December 27, 2012

From Dust to Dust in a Little Blue Box

I am not a reader of biographies. One man or woman's story is as interesting, meaningful and/or powerful as the next person's.  I have never, therefore, seen the sense in reading some famous person's life story during the time I should be focusing on living my own story. Recently, however, I made an exception to my own tenet and decided to read a biography of Spalding Gray.  Spalding, one of my favorite contemporary writers/performers, ended his life a few years back, by jumping off the Staten Island ferry. It was Spalding's gift for insight & his unabashed ability to laugh at himself that I always loved.  One of his famous monologues, Monster in a Box, is a detailed, heart wrenching account of his failed attempts to complete a 1900 page unedited novel based on his own mother's suicide. The monster is the unfinished novel he keeps in a box, and which he realizes he cannot finish because he has never been able to resolve his mother's tragic death & abandonment.  Simply put, the monster is his mother's suicide; he himself is the box, which has contained all the grief of this irrevocable loss. When he too died an equally tragic death, I felt compelled to wonder if he had ever finally come to terms with his mother's violent demise. I couldn't help but to make the assumption that he had not, and that if he had, then perhaps things might have turned out differently for him in the end. It is important to proceed with caution where the dead are concerned...to walk and not to run.
Today I unpacked the box containing my father's remains. It is fairest to say "what remains of my father's remains"-- for in the end his body was divided in more or less four equal parts and distributed among his wife and children. My father was diagnosed too late. He had little time to plan and having always been a reasonably practical man, caught unawares he did not leave instructions for the disposal of his body. There were contradictory reports among family members as to whether he had in the past ever stated a preference for being buried or cremated. The majority in preference of cremation won out in the end. While three of the four parts have been laid to rest in various parts of the globe, the fourth now sits atop my work table in the uppermost room I call a studio.
Cremation is certainly the most expedient and least costly method of disposing of a body, yet so hygienic and informal that it hurts. Significantly more painful than the other alternative; I was surprised to discover. I now clearly see why the rituals surrounding death are so devoutly observed even among the nonreligious. It is really for those left behind that they have stood the test of time and the prevailing lack of genuine religious conviction. These rituals serve the purpose of buying time needed for goodbyes. This small powder blue box I have been holding on to for the past three years is my own monster in a box. I cannot lay my father to rest until I have done all I need to do to let him go. If only I knew what that entailed, I would have purposely set on that course. But mourning is complicated and delicate business; the sometimes subtle processes not always so easy to discern.
When we love someone deeply, they are always taken from us too soon. Though we had always said so much, there was still so much to be said. My father gave me all he had to give. I never doubted that I was loved. One thing he gave me was a love of words and language and of stories. Though I have only a handful of mementos that belonged to him,  I can still hear his legendary stories told in his own melodic and emphatic voice. I feel grateful for this auditory memory I didn't know it was possible to retain. For now, his stories do outlive him and will hopefully be remembered & retold by his grandchildren. Though I fear these too will eventually fade. Already his voice is only with me and in the translation from their original language, some important kernel of his stories is sure to be lost. Time has a way of shredding everything into increasingly finer segments, making dust of it all in its wake. So as precious as words are, they too won't last. At best, the ideas and teachings carried by fading words will find their place in the deepest crevices of the hearts and minds of his descendants.
I choose to put my faith in photographs and images and in the memories and stories evoked by these. Sometimes objects and stories make mutually precious companions. Such is the case of a small pewter sculpture of the virgin of Cobre, which belonged to my father and which not unlike him, has traveled across three different countries in half a century's time, to rest in my little corner of Brooklyn. There is a story attached to this icon, a tale full of magic and superstition. It involves a soothsayer and my father as a young man learning about loyalty and responsibility, losing his innocence while his country and his own fate harshly and rapidly change. I remember the fear, awe and respect in his voice every time he confided this story. A level of fear and respect I've never had to know, but for which I'm sure there must be a very special word.

My father lived an eventful, exciting and overall, extraordinary life. Yet, his passing was excruciatingly painful, tumultuous and humbly unceremonious. I find this final lack of poetry unfathomable. It was a grand personal event, to which no one came--a last supper full of empty chairs. In the ending of Big Fish, when the main character Edward dies, all the significant people in his life and stories show up at his funeral. From the everyday family and friends to the fantastic giants and witches, they all have contributed something to the stories that make up his final story...and they are all present to see him off on his final journey. But some endings are not as just. Instead, they are cruelly dissonant. For my dad, there was no funeral, no end of life party. None of the characters show up in the final chapter. My father, having been a man of many lands, was far from home. Those who would have mattered were either already gone, or could not reach him to play their part. This is one of the tragedies of being an immigrant. In the end only I was witness to his last breath. Though for that gift I will feel forever grateful, the silent celebration of his life has been difficult to reconcile.
My intentions are to travel to India to place his ashes in the River Ganges, where souls are promised re-birth. India is a far and exotic destination, expensive to travel to and requiring sufficient journeying time. For the past three years, I have failed to make this pilgrimage, instead making my travels to other  less committing faraway places. I too need the time to say goodbye and so the blue box continues to sit atop my studio table.  Although he himself was not big on long goodbyes, I don't think my father would really mind all that much if I needed him around just a bit longer--if this were something he could grant me, which it is.  In fact, I think he'd probably be glad to stick around even in his present form, for as long as I needed him to. My dad was no hindu, but he was a deeply spiritual humanist who loved mysticism, as well as eastern philosophy and eastern religious traditions. I think that he might have appreciated the ritual of being taken thousands of miles across the oceans for the sake of symbolically being given a second chance. He would certainly understand being taken there by his first born middle age daughter who may still be learning that true stories end wherever they end, not where we think they should end. And most definitely, I do believe he'd appreciate the poetry of being laid to rest in the dirtiest and most sacred body of water in the world, where fantasy, superstition, religion and the mystery of the unknown & of the everyday, can peacefully converge.

November 28, 2012

Teach your children well. It's not just a song.

While shopping for a box of cookies at the corner drugstore, I notice a 9 year old girl has cut in front of me to stand at the nearly empty checkout line.  I am not in a hurry, so I let her go ahead. Unbeknownst to me, her mother is still shopping and has sent her there to reserve her place at the front of the line.  I only discover this when the mother shows up with a brimming shopping basket and takes her place in front of me. Since the line is only two people deep, I am perplexed by this seemingly unnecessary maneuver. I point out to mom that, although I do not mind waiting, I am curious as to whether she has noticed me standing there.  She, in turn, is baffled by the question.  Do I not see her daughter also standing there...?!
I would like to believe that as we gain experience and awareness, each generation is an improvement on the next. I would like to have faith in the concept that our love for our children includes a wish that they will supersede our own shortsightedness. That our failure to reach out to others in kindness, will only serve to inspire our children to further extend their own generosity.
Teach your kids to lie and cheat and before you've had time to notice,  they'll be doing it to you. Emphasize to them the importance of getting in front of the proverbial line of society, irregardless of what they must do to achieve this place, and you will have forfeited your (and their) humanity. 

April 30, 2012

A Sad Treatise On The Meaning of Meaninglessness

WARNING! The title of this post has been appropriated in part from Werner Herzog's* description of his own contribution to this year's Whitney Biennial.


Bored at the Whitney.

Seeking Meaning and Finding Meaninglessness.

These might have been the options I'd considered as headings for this blog post, had I not, in a somewhat desperate effort to find an explanation, frantically been scouring the pages of the event guide that accompanies this godforsaken exhibition and come across one of my favorite filmmakers' quotes in description of his own piece in the show. Oh, but wait; isn't he, well...German?...and hasn't he been, well...making films for a very long time?... and well, isn't this the Whitney Museum of American Art's Biennial exhibition-- a show intended to focus on contemporary art within U.S. borders?.... And, as if to add insult to injury--why is he being lauded as a "romantic visionary, who is best known for his unorthodox approach to capturing authenticity in his films"?--never mind that I believe both of these to be true... but then, why is he in this show?... I stand confused.
Admittedly, I myself, have not been feeling particularly inspired lately, and so approached my visit to the Whitney Biennial with high hopes of changing my despondent mood. To put it succinctly, I had hoped to feel revitalized, renewed...well, let me just go ahead and say it then: Inspired. Oh, but has this become a dirty word? I obligingly paid my $16 admission fee and in return, expected paradise or even hell. Some stirring, some kernel of feeling or provocation might have been enough. Any surge of emotion would have been preferable to purgatory, to numbness, to absolute boredom. To the significant frustration of my family and friends, my museum visits are usually daylong events, ending with me begrudgingly agreeing to exit, despite a consistently gnawing feeling that I have prematurely departed, albeit with an armful of notes for referencing and cross-referencing my newly acquired insights and discoveries. See, I too am somewhat of a closet anthropologist of all things culture. The 2012 Whitney Biennial features such a sad array of uninspired, desperate art that I was very willingly ready to depart after only a couple of hours of diligently combing through each and every one of the 4 1/2 floors it barely occupies, in search of something. It came as no surprise that on the day of my visit to the Whitney, most of my fellow visitors were huddled in the bar-room like set installed for screenings of Wu Tsang's Wildness, 2012, which documents the underground E side L.A. Latin/LGBT immigrant community; or were crowded into the Film/Video Galleries listening to Amy Taubin's interview with independent filmmaker Kelly Reichardt, whose three films spanning from 2006-2010, were also being screened. Once again, the pull of real life human interaction wins out over the stale, unemotional 2 & 3-D pieces claiming conceptual and intellectual profundity, but devoid of any visceral participation, which constitute a disproportionately large part of this year's Whitney Biennial. The one other saving grace to the bland installations is Dawn Kasper's personal and authentically executed Nomadic Studio Practice Experiment. I admire Dawn's resourceful ingenuity and can't help but wonder what she will come up with, once she has exhausted her list of museum hosts. It isn't the conceptual nature of most of the pieces in this year's biennial that I take offense to. I have great respect and love for conceptual art which raises questions or makes a statement prompting exploration, or provokes a shift in thinking; for isn't the role of art to take us beyond...well, at least beyond, the obvious?
 Since I landed in Soho in the early eighties, practically penniless, with one old dusty-blue suitcase in hand, I have seen art and artists come and go. A minority went the way of fame and fortune, in the blinding limelight that was the art scene of that decade, or faded into the few remaining hidden backstreet lofts that still survive the outdoor mall Soho has become; or died from epidemics, cancer or despair; or in the case of those more given to practical resilience (myself included), moved into more affordable quarters in the border boroughs and adopted lifestyles alternative to the already alternative lifestyle of an artist life in NYC... just in case life wasn't already challenging or complicated enough as a result of that small original transgression. But this is the way of the living, is it not? Change and Transformation. Only passion begets these; and passion back then was as easily exchanged as 4 quarters for a dollar, and for some of us--those who never made it to the Whitney, alot more common. But passion and inspiration are still all around us, and to my understanding, passionate and inspiring art continues to be made, even in those Soho backstreets and in the outer boroughs. So, why are the curators of the Whitney Biennial finding it so hard to locate? As artists, we notoriously make use of our personal experience and react to the times in which we live. If nothing new remained to be said, then no message would need to be communicated and art would no longer have a purpose. This scenario is unfathomable. Contrary to the apparent theme of this year's participating artists, artists continue to make art and the world keeps looking at it and being affected and alas, even transformed by it!
 The art that constitutes the 2012 Whitney Biennial is neither unorthodox nor authentic, and therefore, tragically lacking the power to transform. I am not suggesting that the curators of this year's biennial should have gone to any great lengths to find contemporary painters, sculptors or performance artists with the power to inspire or provoke. Perhaps, that would be a bit passe. Perhaps the trend to seek the more seemingly original, the more au courant--is a need that supersedes that of our recurring, inexhaustible quest for meaning. New things keep happening all the time, and their newness does not automatically make them noteworthy. The pieces being displayed at this year's biennial are laboriously explained in the copious text on the display tags that accompany them. Throughout the exhibits, the stated message is that as meaning is largely ephemeral, meaninglessness must be the answer to all complex questions. But judging by the extensive explanations in text, there also appears to be some insecurity in the art's ability to carry this message. Was this the point then--? Frustrated effort?... or did I blink and miss it? Is the role of the Whitney Biennial to show us the thread that stitches along the collective unconscious of the contemporary art world? or is it to sew in a thread of a particular color and tightly seam it shut? If the first, then we can gather that humanity is feeling helpless and hopeless and that a great sense of apathy and spiritual vacuum continues to pull artists with their dusty-blue suitcases to the fringes of society and dark corners of metropolises the world over and they are making art that nobody sees or cares about. Oh, but wait...this art is at the Whitney! People are seeing it! So that point is irrevocably moot then!
The activist in me is wildly kicking. I refuse to believe that this is the brave new world of art. If the statement at the heart of the 2012 Whitney Biennial is that as a species, we are feeling the need for meaning and purpose but there really isn't any, yet not only do we choose to continue to make art irregardless, but choose to accept the perceived meaninglessness and futility of living and art making; then we have become a sad lot, indeed.
Still, I take comfort in knowing that for the price of an admissions ticket, at the museum gift shop one could buy a pack of edible organic sidewalk chalk, instead.

*Original quote by Werner Herzog: "an extended essay on the meaning of meaninglessness"